I remember the first time I ever played a game of chess. I
remember it not because the game came naturally to me and I was quick to defeat
my opponent; nor did I fumble incompetently only to be destroyed by a fellow
chess novice. I remember the game because it was alien to me. No one in my
family, on either side, had a chess set at home. No one played chess among my
friends, even the most intelligent and cultured. At the time, that seemed quite
natural to me. Since my teen years, however, I have always had a chess set,
always been ready to play a game. Therefore, when I look back on my youth, that
9th grade game of chess played carefully in a post-geometry
classroom against another curious student stands out clearly; and, yes, I did lose.
Almost anyone will know to what I refer when I speak of
chess, whether you play the game or not. However, should there be anyone who
happens across my little blog that hasn’t a clue about what I mean; chess is
a board game played on an eight by eight grid of squares. It pits two players against each other in challenge of strategy and tactics. Each side has sixteen
pieces, half of which are “pawns.” All other pieces, with the exception of two,
are pairs: the “bishops,” “knights,” and “rooks.” Finally, the last two pieces
are the strongest, the “queen,” and the most vulnerable, the “king.”
This post is not very instructional about how to play chess.
On the contrary, it is about how I have learned, and continue to learn to play
chess. After my first, awkward game in the geometry room, I joined a school
“chess club” for a couple of years. My enthusiasm was further boosted during my
teen years by the 1993 film Searching for
Bobby Fischer about a child chess prodigy whose life has some parallels to the
great chess genius referenced in the title.
One of the main sources of information about playing chess
is the tips and tricks about strategy and tactics that you get from fellow
players from time to time. Another important source of information for me in
learning to play chess has been books. The public library has always carried
several volumes about chess. I have also bought several books about chess over
the years. Some of my favorites include:
An Introduction to
Chess: Book 1 by Leonard Barden (1972) as part of Drake Chess Handbooks.
Chess for Dummies
by James Eade (1996) published by IDG Books.
Modern Ideas in the
Chess Openings I by I.A. Horowitz (1953) published by Cornerstone Library.
Teach Yourself Chess
by William R. Hartston (1985) published by Teach Yourself Books.
Of course there are many other books and each has its own
appeal. Another important resource in developing my enthusiasm as well as my
skill for chess was a game that came bundled with the Packard Bell PC my mother
bought for me during my sophomore year of college: Chessmaster 3000. This game had incredible graphics and allowed
for two players or for human vs. computer. The game also had a chess tutor
function that taught chess openings, strategy and tactics, and finishing moves.
These days, there are many diverse sites on the Web tailored to
chess devotees. Here are just a few from my bookmarks:
Now, for the really fun part and how my chess habit relates to my learning life. The most recent Web site added to my list is http://www.chesscademy.com/. Each of the
other three representative sites explores some aspect of chess—historical
and/or tactical. The chesscademy.com Web site, on the other hand, is a
comprehensive “classroom” experience. You can begin instruction at whatever
level you feel comfortable with—beginner, intermediate, or advanced. From
there, the student watches multi-media presentations and then completes brief
quizzes for points.
The most attractive thing to me about the chesscademy.com
Web site is its pedagogical style. Chess is a complex game and I think that to
get to “the next level” at my age, requires some serious study. At the same
time, I want to keep it a game—to keep it fun. Otherwise, what is the use in
trying to be any good. Up for a game? Happy learning!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, criticisms, or corrections? Let me know what you think!