Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey
You first hear it in his voice. Then you notice the glimmer
in his eyes. Then you see the way his hands awkwardly gesticulate with
enthusiasm—and you know. Neil deGrasse Tyson is in love… with the cosmos. His
enthusiasm as a science communicator matched with his brilliance as an
astrophysicist, made him the logical successor to the unforgettable Carl
Sagan—an astronomer from Cornell University who influenced a generation of
young people, myself included, to dream that we could reach the stars—not
merely as a civilization, but as individuals too.
That was done with his original role as host of the first
Cosmos series. The updated and hyper-stylized new Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey is just as
inspiring—its host, just as fascinating. That being said, I will certainly
admit that there is no replacing Carl Sagan. On the other hand, since his
passing there has been very little attempt to do so. The scientific illiteracy
of the general public—at least in the United States—is quite appalling.
The current series consists of 13 episodes, each of which
addresses a different scientific topic: spacetime, light, the greenhouse effect
and so on. Tyson first explores the history of the issue at hand. He then
proceeds to the present and then discusses the potential consequences and often
dangers for the future of the universe, the earth, and humanity.
My favorite of all of the episodes was number 12 “The World
Set Free,” which concerned the greenhouse effect. This episode explains the
greenhouse effect and describes its discovery by Joseph Fourier and Svante Arrhenius. Dr. Tyson then explained how scientific investigation
has provided ample evidence that the global average temperature is increasing,
and this is causing earth’s climate to change. Furthermore, scientists’ studies
have consistently demonstrated that much of this change is due to human
activity, particularly carbon dioxide emissions. Almost as a warning, he
explains how a runaway greenhouse effect engulfed the planet Venus making the
surface of the planet so hot that the oceans permanently evaporated.
Much of the release of carbon dioxide is due to humanity’s
increasing reliance on fossil fuels to generate energy to power our vehicles,
homes, and essentially run our contemporary society. Tyson next discussed the history
of solar power and how its use has been ignored in the past largely because of the
cheapness and wide availability of fossil fuels, such as coal and oil. However,
today’s circumstances indicate the need to increase our use of solar and wind
energy and decrease or eliminate our reliance on fossil fuels.
One of the reasons that the 12th episode is my
favorite is the clear explanations given by Dr. Tyson: For example, he uses a
pet dog’s path along the beach to explain the difference between the concepts
of “weather” and “climate” Another reason that the episode excels, in my
opinion, is that this topic seemed to be one in which Dr. Tyson’s enthusiasm
for the subject matter shone through the brightest. Rather than discuss the
politics of climate change (an erroneous perspective, in my opinion), he
addresses the science behind climate change and keeps that as his focus. In citing this episode, however, I do not mean to say that Dr. Tyson's presentations in the other twelve are not equally strong--I simply mean to emphasize how this particular episode affected me and contributed to my assessment of the series. It is better that I present a representative sample than to rehash the entire series!
Throughout Cosmos,
scientists—some household names, some obscure—are the heroes of the episodes.
These are individuals who had the courage of their convictions. Some were
ostracized from the scientific community, some from the public at large, and
many did not live to see their work vindicated. In almost every instance, their
work was inspired and intended to improve the world and its inhabitants. It’s
rare to see scientists get their due in this manner. More often it is simply
through a footnote in research papers. This unique platform will hopefully
inspire young boys and girls to pursue science, technology, math, and engineering.
It took many years and the work, sweat, and money of many
passionate individuals to bring this Cosmos
“sequel” to the public. It aired on both the Fox Network and The National
Geographic Channel. I found the production to be excellent. The special effects
were “top-notch” and the animated segments were brilliant and inspired. I found
that the series renewed my enthusiasm for scientific inquiry. My hope is that
the millions of viewers that the show reached will inspired many, many others
through its broadcast, repeat on cable, and current showing on Netflix. If you
haven’t had the chance to explore the cosmos through Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey I would highly recommend it. All you
need is an open mind—the series will give you plenty to contemplate!
As always, happy learning!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments, criticisms, or corrections? Let me know what you think!